|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
> From: [email protected] on behalf of Jared Mauch > Sent: Sat 9/8/2007 8:17 AM > To: William Allen Simpson > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter > > > I think this is the most important point so far. There are a lot > of providers that think that their announcements need to be global > to manage link/load balancing with their peers/upstreams. Proper use > of no-export (or similar) on the more specifics and the aggregate > being sent out will reduce the global noise significantly. > > Perhaps some of the providers to these networks will nudge them > a bit more to use proper techniques. > Could a partial solution to this problem be something as simple as the routing vendors implementing something that by default analyzes the routes that you're announcing to your neighbors and automatically flags the more specifics that are covered by an identical larger aggregate with no-export? Rather than relying on the announcing network to make an effort to use no-export, make it a default that can be turned off if the need arises. If the cause of alot of this garbage is indeed caused by cluelessness or apathy, it seems like this would help. If people are too lazy or lacking the knowledge to fix what they're announcing, they're likely too lazy or lacking the knowledge to disable a default setting that flags extra unnecessary routes with no-export. Forrest |