North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
> If you do save it in your BRIB, then you can do this filtering between > RIB and FIB. That turns out to be a completely local feature, requiring > no protocol changes or additions whatsoever, and thus does not even > require an RFC or Internet draft. This feature has been seen in some > circles under the name "ORIB". Ask YFRV's PM for it. ;-) > > Note that this feature *is* CPU intensive. This also does not decrease > the RP RAM usage the way that update filtering would. In fact, due to > the overhead of tracking filtered and non-filtered prefixes, there is > additional RP RAM usage. YMMV. so, bottom line, no help other than reducing fib? randy
|