North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Stephen Stuart wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Tony Finch wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > > > > Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of > > > "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion." > > > > TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not > > per-flow? > > How would you define "user" in that context? Given that we're trusting the user's OS to implement congestion control, it seems reasonable to trust it to define per-user in a sensible way. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY, BACKING NORTHEASTERLY FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SLIGHT OR MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.