North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Michael Airhart <[email protected]> wrote: >I can't speak for Cisco or Cisco IT, but as evidenced by this email, at least part of our connectivity is up. > >No doubt someone official is looking at it as we speak. (I'll just lurk Nanog to get the skinny).. > Cisco's problem seems to be have been resolved. Also see: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/08/update_ciscocom_site.html Thanks to everyone for their verification. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.2 (Build 2014) wj8DBQFGujLsq1pz9mNUZTMRAu7pAJ4s2GtvR24DNGyLwGmEeaz6sLQx7gCfZW/J ALFp5DbrxnvdxL9Qfl8OyHk= =0gF2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|