North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox
- From: Brandon Galbraith
- Date: Tue Jul 24 19:44:45 2007
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZGY3wxldb95uyqiVh6vcZUtPISqcNWvg/kLkUi6YrsTnr51tGb2NGpRga2Lf1ufJSaXQVi+bGbaXS9Dy3XOui42IN3LmyqPTXptbqbhDwpy8ouwAymxvybeQhA3iwzPLN36mbwAzz94tSJvC+OBVhbUSYrdc98ncECKqtMVETTs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OtNQx8vmufZCBBRqLS4/0QiSAlgnqj45p4kjBmYWymAxCi3u8xrkvOxNAcHZKTh9qeKi5TbvBrucI0+hyxJOq7a2ENBAYmuFL0FbMyVayM2aXL2A3GymcZHPG7igum5YUaETnWlP4TvxtW3DYfkjfMUxuCueaMMa2w0M9LvhVms=
On 7/24/07, Chris L. Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
> But it certainly would not hurt if there was a good way to report > drones to ISPs and actually get some attention to the problem. A > bunch of small streams quickly build up to a larger river in the
> end, I guess.
I'd point at the IETF/INCH-WG work for a standard [email protected] reporting process/format... If you send hundreds or thousands of reports to an ISP abusedesk (or ISPs' abusedesks) a standard machine parsable format is a
key ingredient.
I think that atleast one ISP would love to see standards formatted reports about it's users ([email protected]), provided that the appropriate information
was included.
I think at that point, machine-readable formats should be passed up for some sort of abuse API interchange, where all involved parties can pull status information in real-time. You also have the benefit of automated systems having the ability to integrate into the system.
|