North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Durand, Alain wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Chad Oleary > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:02 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan > > > > Personally, I see v6 as something that needed and desired by > > the certain groups. However, when looking at the enterprise, > > for example, better solutions are needed for things like > > multi-homing, last I checked. > > It is just the same multi-homing as v4. No better for sure. yup, and see below for a bug-a-boo > > DNSSEC comes to mind, but that's a whole different story. > > Add, since a host can have many preferred addresses, which to > > use? How do deprecated addresses get withdrawn from DNS? > > This is a very good point. Having multiple addresses per interface > introduce a lot a complexity that is not well understood today. > However, nothing forces you there. If you do not run ULA, but > run PA or PI space, you can very well manage only one v6 address > per interface. I think you mean 'PI' not 'PA or PI' because if you have PA and multihome you'll have 2 addresses then have to play the 'which one is 'best' game...