North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Durand, Alain wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > 1) What is the IPv6 'service'? > > > For example, is it reasonable to define a 'basic' level > > > service as web+mail and an 'extended' service as > > everything else? > > > > > > > actually, for some of us there is the thought that before > > the "basic" service of web+email can work at all, one needs > > to have a couple of other infrastructure pieces in play, > > namely DNS and NTP... Oh, and the routing to knit these > > services together. > > Sure, this is very important... but I was talking about the "user > experience". > > - Alain. good point. there are "levels" of basic services. i suspect that the network operations folks would want to have working viable v6 (naming, timestamps, audit, measurement) running -before- turning up production "basic" service for the "user experience". assuming that is the case, what things to these assembled operators think are critical for operational stability in bringing online a new address family? Randy had a non-exaustive list at the last IEPG. To memory: MIB, AAAA, DNS, NTP, SYSLOG, DHCP, RADIUS, CALEA, etc. --bill
|