North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: TCP congestion
- From: Fred Baker
- Date: Thu Jul 12 14:58:13 2007
- Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/oregon verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=296; t=1184261844; x=118512584 c=relaxed/simple; s=oregon; h=To:Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20TCP=20congestion |Sender:=20 |To:=20Brian=20Knoll=20((TTNET))=20<[email protected]> bh=Pohlr/rNmMxAhoJs+K2wAiToqVyWS+FjsBWElnExR3E=; b=nt3EZEh7OBzi2XtXJmkhVZW3GUBjE8OeTDfYTnjF8Z0MxrgTlsRVmG5TlFgps9+3ul9RqQ 9Dbt1L797HdgithMACz8q8PxeI7IYBtQ+yW1Q0RUMEe4PVHiH0DHf5re;
On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Brian Knoll ((TTNET)) wrote:
If the receiver is sending a DUP ACK, then the sender either never
received the first ACK or it didn't receive it within the timeframe it
expected.
or received it out of order.
Yes, a tcpdump trace is the first step.
|