North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: TCP congestion

  • From: Fred Baker
  • Date: Thu Jul 12 14:58:13 2007
  • Authentication-results:; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=296; t=1184261844; x=118512584 c=relaxed/simple; s=oregon; h=To:Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;; [email protected]; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20TCP=20congestion |Sender:=20 |To:=20Brian=20Knoll=20((TTNET))=20<[email protected]> bh=Pohlr/rNmMxAhoJs+K2wAiToqVyWS+FjsBWElnExR3E=; b=nt3EZEh7OBzi2XtXJmkhVZW3GUBjE8OeTDfYTnjF8Z0MxrgTlsRVmG5TlFgps9+3ul9RqQ 9Dbt1L797HdgithMACz8q8PxeI7IYBtQ+yW1Q0RUMEe4PVHiH0DHf5re;

On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Brian Knoll ((TTNET)) wrote:

If the receiver is sending a DUP ACK, then the sender either never
received the first ACK or it didn't receive it within the timeframe it

or received it out of order.

Yes, a tcpdump trace is the first step.