North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Level(3) faux paux

  • From: Neil J. McRae
  • Date: Thu Jul 12 02:23:17 2007
Maybe level 3 have more vocal or higher profile customer base? Personally speaking I've found level 3 to have outstanding service and network availibility.

Neil.

From: Security Admin (NetSec) <[email protected]>
Sent: 12 July 2007 06:56
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Level(3) faux paux

I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more frequently than with most other Tier 1?s.  Am unsure whether or not this is a mis-statement, but based on NANOG posts, Level(3) [AS3356] seems to show up more often with issues than say Sprint [AS1239].  Is their any one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages such as these?  Would think it might be a good thing to know for proper mulit-homing relationships to minimize the type of outage that Yahoo faced?

 

SecAdmin (aka Edward Ray)