North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Barrett Lyon wrote: > > If you deploy dual-stack, it is much easier to keep doing the DNS > > queries > > using IPv4 transport, and there is not any practical advantage in > > doing so > > with IPv6 transport. > > Thanks Jordi, not to sound too brash but, I'm already doing so. I am > trying not to deploy a hacked v6 service which requires an incumbent > legacy protocol to work. > > > Of course, is nice to have IPv6 support in as many DNS > > infrastructure pieces > > as possible, and a good signal to the market. Many TLDs already do, > > and the > > root servers are moving also in that direction. Hopefully then the > > rest of > > the folks involved in DNS move on. > > I would like to support v6 so a native v6 only user can still > communicate with my network, dns and all, apparently in practice that > is not easy to do, which is somewhat ironic given all of the v6 push > lately. It also seems like the roots are not even fully supporting > this properly? there are providers that have (in the US even if that matters) ipv6 connected auth servers, that could even help. I can't seem to make one of them want to be a registrar too :( but... maybe Ultra/Neustar could do that for you?
|