North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

  • Date: Fri Jun 29 10:19:43 2007
  • Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp;; s=MDaemon; t=1183129759; x=1183734559; [email protected]; q=dns; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To: Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Mime-version: Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; b=kgiogHgntkSVh2 Vli1y0WSHyeEkSya1uz9yxO6jBWl/IGkCcwJaJHqiX1R1irHTmGC9T7T/Xz4XZ6Y sDrX4yt8H2BgjWKayy0NZTy0kSqNMRWYTIU//fpFnQcfhjtv2ATsapThmQy19FHn oEPeX+0z+AvbSMLPYfgNLMxvvuubw=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon;; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=iiyzvZAIImI17s+4cJDTC/gSPHE6f8q6gQygCUnnU95UekTWSA67t36ZUiMTzhPYFpRtdWUuH4vzf7Nzhr1hdxWmzKhIXxgr5EMBer2aWTtFIVeXShfi28v3k5teZLdadWSs35t6H0Ri2EnEfKZo9EIF3IoSs1jgWfWcWpmPwRY=;

In ARIN you have a policy to request IPv6 PI. So what is the problem ?


> De: Christian Kuhtz <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[email protected]>
> Fecha: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:37:23 +0000
> Para: Andy Davidson <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, Donald Stahl
> <[email protected]>
> CC: <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
> Until there's a practical solution for multihoming, this whole discussion is
> pretty pointless.
> --
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Davidson <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:27:33
> To:Donald Stahl <[email protected]>
> Cc:[email protected]
> Subject: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 14:24, Donald Stahl wrote:
>>> That's the thing .. google's crawlers and search app runs at layer
>>> 7, v6 is an addressing system that runs at layer 3.  If we'd (the
>>> community) got everything right with v6, it wouldn't matter to
>>> Google's applications whether the content came from a site hosted
>>> on a v4 address, or a v6 address, or even both.
>> If Google does not have v6 connectivity then how are they going to
>> crawl those v6 sites?
> I think we're debating from very similar positions...
> v6 isn't the ideal scenario of '96 extra bits for free', because if
> life was so simple, we wouldn't need to ask this question.
> Andy

The IPv6 Portal:

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.