|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
Seth Mattinen wrote: > > So we should deploy IPv6... I get it. The argument comes up time > and time again. I would do it tomorrow - nay, today - if I had an answer > to one thing: How the heck do I multihome? I have v6 space from Sprint > to play with, but I'm reluctant to use it because I can't multihome with > it. In the arin region you can qualify for a pi allocation of ipv6 under the same criterion you qualify for one under ipv4. fill out: http://www.arin.net/registration/templates/v6-end-user.txt > The end user doesn't care about 4 vs. 6, or anything we discuss here, > all they care is that it *works*. It's all a magic box to them anyway. > Businesses care that we can guarantee that it works. I want the same > reliability with v6 that I have right now with v4, and single homed v6 > isn't going to cut it, nor is some host-based hack, or every host gets a > v6 address from each v6 provider, or stupid DNS tricks. Am I crazy to > want routers to make the routing decisions? > > ~Seth > >
|