North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

  • From: randal k
  • Date: Thu Jun 14 13:11:26 2007
  • Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=c86q6v+99RHY82kF6In9ELq0ixonpUeYFjE/KOHYxrNwHVhf8AdlowxkYmtmr2Nziotch1tzm91KV0UILtRMvi2t2xDrA1OgXSGSrvLOyoGvs5K7bszLokJCPb+IIT+rrhkNJ7v01HIvGBuB74mtHFUGjGo11Uz/s25ksYBSXs8=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=LlxIHCJwVUU+FTV3Vqty/Lvmc2aDq7VmkhFjCesCvvQCVMDeT5TdL3z0fVoeRZa/wi8TGp9+/mHgXL57ySic+Zrfq2MoXIAL3EQJgjfiXn7ayk+hW4ZAi+6bxipfLU8HDdtvJktpmaKGWOcRx+879Kr6YDvaZITIdwefx23JcVE=


On 6/14/07, Olsen, Jason <[email protected]> wrote:

Neither one of these seems well-equipped to deal with "virtual"
interfaces such as an ethernet interface that is VRRP or HSRP'd between
two routers (eg x.x.x.10 is your "virtual" IP for the subnet's gateway,
router 1 has physical interface IP of x.x.x.8 and router 2 has x.x.x.9).

This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in my opinion, very necessary.

randal