North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted

  • Date: Mon Jun 04 03:10:48 2007

This is one of the ways some load-balancer vendors do IPv6 today. They still
talk IPv4 to the servers, so you don't need to modify anything, just add an
AAAA managed by the load balancer. It is a kind of combination between
NAT-PT and load-balancer.


> De: matthew zeier <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[email protected]>
> Fecha: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:58:37 -0700
> Para: John Curran <[email protected]>
> CC: Igor Gashinsky <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
> John Curran wrote:
>> Best of luck with it; load-balancers aren't generally hiding
>> in ISP's backbones and it hasn't been major revenue for
>> the traditional router crowd.   Net result is there hasn't
>> been much IPv6 attention in that market...
> I suppose, but certain places like Mozilla, would be dead in the water
> without load balancers.  Citrix got their act together and shipped 8.0
> with v6 vips on the front talking to v4 servers on the backend.
> Rock on Citrix.

The IPv6 Portal:

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.