North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

  • From: Randy Bush
  • Date: Sat Jun 02 10:16:19 2007

Kradorex Xeron wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>>> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
>>>>> why won't they do this in v6?
>>>> wee, lookie! redistribute connected
>>> whee!  lookie!  minds disconnected, at least from public good.
>> Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig
>> happening in the world :(
> Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually 
> screws it up? :P

yes.  and with ula-c, it's exactly the same as pi.  except there is one
advantage, ula-c relies on the router vendor to fill in the prefix.  you
still have to choose the interface to which to apply it (think two
external upstreams and five site links).