|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]
I've been trying to collect the info about services (including ISPs and transit providers) and products (software and hardware) that "say" they offer IPv6 (still in the phase of verifying one by one, but almost done !). Is still not complete, but I think provides a good picture. http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/ Just a few examples: You can type ISP in the free search box, or TLD, or load balancer. Regards, Jordi > De: Donald Stahl <[email protected]> > Responder a: <[email protected]> > Fecha: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:07:19 -0400 (EDT) > Para: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <[email protected]> > CC: <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted] > > >> I guess we have different definitions for "most significant backbones". >> Unless you mean they have a dual-stack router running _somewhere_, say, for >> instance, at a single IX or a lab LAN or something. Which is not >> particularly useful if we are talking about a "significant backbone". > Rather than go back and forth- can we get some real data? > > Can anyone comment on the backbone IPv6 status of the major carriers? > > -Don ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
|