|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6 Advertisements
> > That's not what I said. If /48 are accepted by * then people with > > a /32 or whatever will deagg to /48. > Obviously you don't need to accept /48's from anywhere- you can restrict > it to the PI pool- then /32's don't deaggregate but networks approved by > ARIN or RIPE or whomever still work. Obviously one can but will others. If they don't then others pressure you not to. I've seen this with v4, lets say a friend (no, really), a conscientious provider filters at registry allocations plus a few bits has reachability issues to massively deagg'd shed colo. Good ISP then gets pressure from customers who can't reach bad ISP, filters get relaxed Even with todays limited v6 deployment a few other posts have shown we don't have a coherent view of what filters are applicable to which prefix ranges. Roll forward to general deployment and it'll be swamp. I don't mind buying FIB to be part of a working net, I don't want to buy extra so people can be muppets. > If we start giving out /32's to work around filters I'm not sure that > solves any problems :) And if no one is going to honor a /48 then why > bother to give them out? I'm not too fussed what size and how many filters we have as long as they're the same at all ISPs so there is no doubt or confusion to be exploited. KISS ftw. brandon
|