North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
On Tue, 29 May 2007 [email protected] wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said: > > On Tue, 29 May 2007, John Curran wrote: > > > This changeover will not: 1) Fix the routing problem > > > inherent with present locator/endpoint binding, nor > > > 2) solve your favorite fib/rib/cam/convergence limit, > > > nor 3) make the infrastructure inherently either > > > easier to operate or more secure. > > > but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not) > > Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet > that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it? was the ":)" not enough: "I'm joking" ?? > > Just askin', ya know? some people do think that it does... they would be wrong, but they don't know that.
|