North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

  • From: Valdis . Kletnieks
  • Date: Tue May 29 17:13:05 2007 
On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, John Curran wrote:
> > This changeover will not: 1) Fix the routing problem
> > inherent with present locator/endpoint binding, nor
> > 2) solve your favorite fib/rib/cam/convergence limit,
> > nor 3) make the infrastructure inherently either
> > easier to operate or more secure.

> but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not)

Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet
that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it?

Just askin', ya know?

Attachment: pgp00025.pgp
Description: PGP signature