North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
On Tue, 29 May 2007 [email protected] wrote: > > > > For core links it should IMHO be mostly possible to keep them > > IPv4/IPv6 > > dual-stack. > > What's wrong with MPLS in the core and 6PE at the edge? > > Right there you have two possible tactics that are worthy of being > publicly discussed and compared. stewart bamford gave a good presentation about this very thing 4 nanogs ago (or maybe 5)> There are some support issues to keep in mind of course. > > > For Cable > > systems only recently the Docsis 3.0 standard was released and that > > would still require a lot of upgrades. Tunneling those users > > might be a > > way to provide IPv6 connectivity to these users without much > > ado. > > Cable is a consumer access technology. Realistically, IPv6 is going to > kick off with deployments to research, education and business users, not > consumers. Cable will catch up in their own good time as they are driven > to IPv6 by RFC 1918 exhaustion. what's interesting is the chicken/egg problem of users/content/ipv6. What's driving v6 deployment?
|