|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
On Tue, May 29, 2007, [email protected] wrote: > That's why I suggested that NANOG run some kind of IPv6 vendor showcase > in which all the vendors would be running an interoperable IPv6 network. > As many have pointed out, this is not just about routers since Cisco and > Juniper have had IPv6 support for years and both are in use on > production IPv6 networks in Asia. People need to see things like the > Hexago gateways, Teredo servers, proxies, management consoles/tools, and > so on. Even the easy stuff needs to be on display because if it can't be > seen then people will not believe that it is easy. >From someone who hasn't looked into IPv6 customer deployments: * So is DHCPv6 the "way to go" for deploying IPv6 range(s) to end-customers? Considering the current models of L2TP over IP for broadband aggregation and wholesaling where the customer device speaks PPPoX. * Has anyone sat down and thought about the security implications for running native IPv6 addresses on end-devices which, at the moment, don't have 'direct' access to the internet (ie sitting behind a NAT.) * Has anyone looked into the effects of oppertunistic IPSEC on stuff like network IDSes? k Adrian
|