|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Interesting new dns failures
>>> On 5/21/2007 at 2:09 PM, Edward Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > At 3:50 PM -0500 5/21/07, Gadi Evron wrote: > >>As to NS fastflux, I think you are right. But it may also be an issue of >>policy. Is there a reason today to allow any domain to change NSs >>constantly? > > Although I rarely find analogies useful when trying to explain > something, I want to use one now to see if I understand this. > > Let's say you rob convenience stores as a career choice. Once your > deed is done, you need to get away fast. So moving fast is a real > help to criminals. Since moving fast is rarely helpful for decent > folk, maybe we should just slow every one down - this certainly would > make it easier for law enforcement to catch the criminals. There are these things called speed limits on all[0] public streets (in the USA, at least). Also things like stop signs and traffic lights. People exceeding the limit and driving recklessly can and regularly are stopped by police. When such drivers attempt to evade police, they are chased, even though it is dangerous to the police, bystanders, and the people being pursued, because there is a good chance that they are running because they've done something else, something worse. So, yeah. We do have speed limits. And suspicion of nefarious activity is put on anyone who grossly exceeds them. > If the above is not an accurate analogy to the NS fastflux issue, I'd > like to know what the deviations are. I don't doubt there are any, > but from what little I've gathered, the problem isn't the NS fastflux > but the activity that it hides - if it is indeed hiding activity. As > in, not every one speeding around town is running from the law. No, but it's still prohibited. But yeah, it's just an analogy. And like many, you can bend it to support either side. [0] Last I knew, the experiments with speed-limitless roads after the drop of the federal 55 mph limit had all gone back to some arbitrary limits. Even Montana. BÂinformation contained in this e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact [email protected]
|