North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: motivation for routing a bit of 44.0.0.0/8
I think based on the way things are going the city will be just fine with it :-) Of course, if I had a nickel for every time I've had this theoretical discussion I'd jingle when I walk, so we'll see how it plays out. [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2007 19:49:49 CDT, Neal R said: > >> Set up a separate SSID exclusively for HAM use. Use IPsec AH - >> cryptographically signed traffic keeps the unlicensed out without >> breaking the no payload encryption requirements. City gets help with the >> civil defense radio of the 21st century, HAMs get a new toy, and >> everyone is happy. Sure, there are security concerns, but the interface >> to the outside world is a proxy server HAMs can use while doing storm >> watch and such ... nobody gets in or out without a note from the FCC ... >> > > >> Or am I making this just a bit too simple? >> > > The hams might be OK on it. The city probably won't be thrilled unless > you can find a way to get their legal staff to sign off on it. Remember, > most lawyers aren't geeks, and will judge a proposal on a different basis > than geeks do. > >
|