North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec
- From: Lincoln Dale
- Date: Mon May 07 18:45:21 2007
> Lower than 1500 mtu always requires some kind of hack in real life.
>
> That would be the adjust-mss which is the hack-of-choice
note that using 'adjust-mss' only adjusts the MSS for TCP.
it won't do much good for already-encapsulated IPSec traffic with protocol 47
or tunneled over UDP...
cheers,
lincoln.
- References:
- barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Joe Maimon
- RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Lincoln Dale
- Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Joe Maimon
- Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Joe Maimon
- Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Jo Rhett
- Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec Joe Maimon
|