North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing
On May 2, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Yup, these really long .sigs used to annoy me no end, especially when trying to read email over dial-up or satellite or some other slow access method. I used to complain to the sender that it was a stupid, unenforceable practice.... And then I worked for a place that automagically inserted something similar.... After countless (ok, it was probably only 9 or so, but it sure felt countless at the time) meetings with different groups all pointing fingers at each other ("Its legal's doing!", "SOX! We have to do it for SOX reasons", "The mail server automatically does it and we don't know where to turn it off"(!), "Think of the children!") I eventually just gave in and lived with it... That fact that my (work) emails had some random gobbledygook inserted that I had no control over didn't in any way change the importance [0] or validity[1] of what I had typed above it (and giving up the fight allowed me to work on other, more important stuff -- like keeping the network running). I don't think that Ron is choosing to put this .sig in his mail, some ugly corporate mail gateway is probably appending it for him. While he could spend a huge amount of time trying to explain to someone at Time Warner that it is a stupid thing to do, I sure he has better things to do... Warren [0] about zero [1] also about zero.
-- Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes. Then if he didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot.
|