North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8
[email protected] wrote: >> We checked with IANA, ARIN, and the US DoD regarding 7.0.0.0/8. We >> were told that this netblock should not see the light of day, > > 10/8 used to be a DoD address block, but it was also used exclusively in > their blacker networks and similar non-connected infrastructure. The > result is that 10/8 was opened up for others to use as well. Could we do > similar with 7/8? What problem would that solve instead of reducing a wee tiny bit the collisions that might occur? Large networks are currently already established and renumbering them from 10.0.0.0/8 to 7.0.0.0/8 would still be renumbering. For those networks it is much better to simply get a block from their RIR and use that and never have collisions. Also note that Fastweb in Italy is already using 7.0.0.0/8 inside their network for their customers, who sit behind a NAT. Greets, Jeroen Attachment:
signature.asc
|