North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
- From: Bill Stewart
- Date: Sat Apr 14 19:19:00 2007
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eWU/h83UDf6b8jJWiS/1jKjJ8MQRqNRe14kk6O0BpYG9BGMoPWt9rBHsRAUrqQGJT8jtfGkDaCv9oQ2C6L95ICkKe+J2EfDjH9ChRiSUX0DMLkdbmTPlTmvXIu5t+4lJK1Fsgt/kBzt/gth8qfgNHTVWaNC8EKorej+X5zlCROA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iHwtjXREncSbha1ptMQAF8nvdxVRRuOLwrN+R23RSBqoYInmhfoazv7/qHKoVrDmv5F1Xtua/jwHByxt/+z9bheOI3RNtcCZ2qTh0B37kmJo30ciHptWwRiVSqqrQolK+eggM3QAnUsBrdGjhc8k+5FiOnpNcMvn01oxngIk7ZI=
One of my customers comments that he doesn't care about jumbograms of
9K or 4K - what he really wants is to be sure the networks support
MTUs of at least 1600-1700 bytes, so that various combinations of
IPSEC, UDP-padding, PPPoE, etc. don't break the real 1500-byte packets
underneath.
|