North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks

  • From: Chris Owen
  • Date: Mon Apr 09 15:12:14 2007
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; b=RaH94MIOzCk9P+aVPFBe4S5WgQRLG5mQtpzLbBd/VIff5pNjL2e8c7bvtR9vpHUpSEqy5n2E9z3nYfgQS8srVNcqy8SPfXHyuu/QMmxuol6KFv9ycqwhp53sM8u2JnbWWkd2A0vHRLo3Fh/ypHQDljxsaIWd5CQb6Y/n8TsP34Q=; c=nofws; d=hubris.net; q=dns; s=hubris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:49 PM, John L wrote:


I don't have PI space, but I do have a competent ISP so I've never had any
mail problems due to adjacent addresses.

Having a competent ISP isn't a guarantee of exemption...only a contributor. As evidenced by the discussion, some people choose the scope of their wrath arbitrarily.

Nothing is a guarantee of exemption from a sufficiently perverse or hostile email administrator, but being in the middle of a well managed /20 works pretty well for me.

Well, "well managed" to me would mean that allocations from that /20 were SWIPed or a rwhois server was running so that if any of those 4,000 IP addresses does something bad you don't get caught in the middle.

Chris

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Owen         ~ Garden City (620) 275-1900 ~  Lottery (noun):
President          ~ Wichita     (316) 858-3000 ~    A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc      www.hubris.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGGo9KElUlCLUT2d0RArewAKCRHTeEN9tMOvvfH6/cql6ua81qAwCg2eqd
jVGT9wUPV2hRItrA3+tp5n0=
=M3YG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----