North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks

  • From: Fergie
  • Date: Sat Apr 07 23:40:19 2007 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Chris Owen <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:51 AM, Fergie wrote:
>
>> Again, a simple recursive WHOIS will show you sub-allocations if they
>> are properly SWIP'ed.
>
>Define "properly".  The Cox addresses in my example are SWIPed.  Are  
they "properly" SWIPed?  How could you tell from whois?
>

Are is/are the exact prefix(es) in question?

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGGGJtq1pz9mNUZTMRAqEvAKDc2heZ5tTCZPkJXP1BkKiCQbjpwACg5+kA
aMVT4/A79/VEZR8rKVv+AcY=
=KafZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/