North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names

  • From: Roland Dobbins
  • Date: Sun Apr 01 19:44:40 2007
  • Authentication-results: sj-dkim-7; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim7002 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=724; t=1175470901; x=1176334901; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20On-going=20Internet=20Emergency=20and=20Domain=20Name s |Sender:=20; bh=fZgWd+VjkBtW3aJHvQOTyRRfImFmPi40HHkcZyMMGzQ=; b=p8vp8KVNch9Kb1M2Fbtou9pKFZ52XVXK8HX9X0SIAvpy/E4HGT9AjjV51qe4D93s494TB2qH THE9YNZ42x/LdFXbXFApuyb+vT0Wtgiq/7+qPxclKbZbcstBojaYpQYH;


On Apr 1, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:

By ensuring data published by registry's can be previewed, all
registrars would be affected equally.

But what is the probative value of the 'preview'? By what criteria is the reputational quality of the domain assessed, and by whom?

It almost seems as if the base problem has to do with credit-card transaction validation and fraud reporting, rather than anything to do with the actual domain registration process?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice

Words that come from a machine have no soul.

-- Duong Van Ngo