North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: [funsec] Not so fast, broadband providers tell big users (fwd)

  • From: Frank Bulk
  • Date: Fri Mar 23 09:44:32 2007

Don't confuse USF with ICC.  It's USF that you're contributing to directly
on your telephone bill and ICC through your long distance payments (which
relates to the at&t case).

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andy
Davidson
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:38 PM
To: Roland Dobbins
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [funsec] Not so fast, broadband providers tell big users (fwd)


On 13 Mar 2007, at 20:31, Roland Dobbins wrote:


> On Mar 13, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Daniel Senie wrote:
>
>> A universal service charge could be applied to all bills, with the  
>> funds going to subsidize rural areas.
>>
> This is already done in the U.S., to no discernible effect.
>

That isn't *quite* the opinion that AT&T have ...

    ... http://gigaom.com/2007/02/07/atts-free-call-bill-2-million/


Although that is people using the rural kickback as a loophole to  
provide free telephony to people outside the area.. still shows that  
regulation always comes with an unexpected effect when times,  
technology and ideas advance.

Cheers
-a