North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

  • From: Roland Dobbins
  • Date: Fri Mar 02 20:25:03 2007
  • Authentication-results: ams-dkim-2; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=749; t=1172884886; x=1173748886; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Where=20are=20static=20bogon=20filters=20appropriate? =20was=3A=2096.2.0.0/16=20Bogons |Sender:=20; bh=NDCSeDF46SP/+hJpUyWGXDNZZW/pGCeCOTO7AP6RMLs=; b=KkKiCwWj43z+FEsvmAsbfJj71xak966x/tsEVeWnjvR7iCV3hYVVEnfEbncL1EK8OH3IZJuG xt8bbRjMDlRepzDEv8EpO1EdRlhI7cAtVriV5nAO49LN7Cc3yZy+XonE;


On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:

How much of a problem is traffic from unallocated addresses? Backbone operators probably have NetFlow data which they could mine to find out.
On the other hand, how much of a problem is obsolete bogon filters causing
everytime IANA delegates another block to an RIR?

Or by the way, how much spoofed traffic uses allocated addresses?

No one has done the digging required to answer any of these questions, unfortunately.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice

The telephone demands complete participation.

-- Marshall McLuhan