North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Colocation in the US.

  • From: Brandon Galbraith
  • Date: Wed Jan 24 19:29:38 2007
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=B/q42tkbM+6Soy/US5/BXrPL2t2DbAPjvGB4k31cLvgQ1VM6KMz2WlI1o3t8bNFQSIyb0H28/an+yBZ7tCmf9IbiLCTIaJpt/FeV5ji96kGSPyjnBKgZzzPJuci/KwE/41a+ivoSBVb4x5ijt4Ky5YcLS88L7paynMEVap+yRzU=

On 1/24/07, Deepak Jain <[email protected]> wrote:


Speaking as the operator of at least one datacenter that was originally
built to water cool mainframes... Water is not hard to deal with, but it
has its own discipline, especially when you are dealing with lots of it
(flow rates, algicide, etc). And there aren't lots of great manifolds to
allow customer (joe-end user) service-able connections (like how many
folks do you want screwing with DC power supplies/feeds without some
serious insurance)..

Once some standardization comes to this, and valves are built to detect
leaks, etc... things will be good.

DJ


In the long run, I think this is going to solve a lot of problems, as cooling the equipment with a water medium is more effective then trying to pull the heat off of everything with air. But standardization is going to take a bit.