North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

  • From: Roland Dobbins
  • Date: Sun Jan 07 16:56:13 2007
  • Authentication-results: sj-dkim-7; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim7002 verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1100; t=1168206610; x=1169070610; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim7002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<[email protected]> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Network=20end=20users=20to=20pull=20down=202=20gigaby tes=20a=20day,=20continuously? |Sender:=20; bh=sZnVl6mN2B9LhccXLjO3o7oEki75d94jZ1Eyw7yFYK8=; b=oPtTZ3+mGS043n8SO63aPWBD3z8J6nB0+c6kUKdu3LwraJy9jAK82sJCz9wlLhqsoEEncRDl kIX4BzUExV7VwqvVUU7xqIhPuO06eVrMsuzFaTfaguRTta1doY/9guKo;


On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:

Now comes the "please forgive me" part, but most of your questions arn't
relevant to the NANOG charter

I believe that's open to interpretation - for example, the question about mobile devices is relevant to mobile SPs, the question about offline viewing has an impact on perceived network usage patterns, the 'supernode' questions same, the TV vs. HDTV question, same (size/ length), the DRM question same (help desk/supportability), platforms same (help desk/supportability). The ad question is is actually out- of-charter, though I suspect of great interest to many of the list subscribers

Now, if you don't *want* to answer the above questions, that's perfectly fine; but they're certainly within the list charter, and entirely relevant to network operations, heh.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice

Technology is legislation.

-- Karl Schroeder