North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Home media servers, AUPs, and upstream bandwidth utilization.
- From: Thomas Leavitt
- Date: Mon Dec 25 03:28:25 2006
Check the AUP and TOS for that EVDO connection - my guess is that by
viewing stuff from your Slingbox, you're risking termination of service.
I don't have an EVDO connection myself (still toodling along with my
Sidekick's GPRS), and part of the reason why is that they have a lot of
what I think are unreasonable restrictions on how these services can be
used -- this is based on what I've read on the various mailing lists I'm
on (Dave Farber's IP, Declan McCullagh's Politech, and Dewayne
Hendrick's Dewayne-Net).
I don't know how significant restrictions like this are from a
competitive perspective, but my broadband ISP also has a very liberal
TOS... and that's one of the reasons I use them. I suspect that as items
like the Slingbox become more common, folks will start paying more
attention to what they're permitted to do with their upstream bandwidth.
Thomas
Roland Dobbins wrote:
I recently purchased a Slingbox Pro, and have set it up so that I can
remotely access/control my home HDTV DVR and stream video remotely.
My broadband access SP specifically allow home users to run servers,
as long as said servers don't cause a problem for the SP
infrastructure nor for other users or doing anything illegal; as long
as I'm not breaking the law or making problems for others, they don't
care.
The Slingbox is pretty cool; when I access it, both the video and
audio quality are more than acceptable. It even works well when I
access it via EVDO; on average, I'm pulling down about 450kb/sec up to
about 580kb/sec over TCP (my home upstream link is a theoretical
768kb/sec, minus overhead; I generally get something pretty close to
that).
What I'm wondering is, do broadband SPs believe that this kind of
system will become common enough to make a signficant difference in
traffic paterns, and if so, how do they believe it will affect their
access infrastructures in terms of capacity, given the typical
asymmetries seen in upstream vs. downstream capacity in many broadband
access networks? If a user isn't doing something like breaking the
law by illegally redistributing copyrighted content, is this sort of
activity permitted by your AUPs? If so, would you change your AUPs if
you saw a significant shift towards non-infringing upstream content
streaming by your broadband access customers? If not, would you
consider changing your AUPs in order to allow this sort of upstream
content streaming of non-infringing content, with the caveat that
users can't caused problems for your infrastructure or for other
users, and perhaps with a bandwidth cap?
Would you police down this traffic if you could readily classify it,
as many SPs do with P2P applications? Would the fact that this type
of traffic doesn't appear to be illegal or infringing in any way lead
you to treat it differently than P2P traffic (even though there are
many legitimate uses for P2P file-sharing systems, the presumption
always seems to be that the majority of P2P traffic is in
illegally-redistributed copyrighted content, and thus P2P technologies
seem to've acquired a taint of distaste from many quarters, rightly or
wrongly).
Also, have you considered running a service like this yourselves, a la
VoIP/IPTV?
Vidoeconferencing is somewhat analogous, but in most cases,
videoconference calls (things like iChat, Skype videoconferencing,
etc.) generally seem to use a less bandwidth than the Slingox, and it
seems to me that they will in most cases be of shorter duration than,
say, a business traveler who wants to keep up with Lost or 24 and so
sits down to stream video from his home A/V system for 45 minutes to
an hour at a stretch.
Sorry to ramble, this neat little toy just sparked a few questions,
and I figured that some of you are dealing with these kinds of issues
already, or are anticipating doing so in the not-so-distant future.
Any insight or informed speculation greatly appreciated!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice
All battles are perpetual.
-- Milton Friedman
--
Thomas Leavitt - [email protected] - 831-295-3917 (cell)
*** Independent Systems and Network Consultant, Santa Cruz, CA ***
begin:vcard
fn:Thomas Leavitt
n:Leavitt;Thomas
org:Godmoma's Forge, LLC
adr:Suite B;;916 Soquel Ave.;Santa Cruz;CA;95062;United States
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Systems and Network Consultant
tel;fax:831-469-3382
tel;cell:831-295-3917
url:http://www.godmomasforge.com/
version:2.1
end:vcard
|