North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: anycasting behind different ASNs?
> My real question was whether anyone actually cared about inconsistent AS > paths and did something (drop traffic) because of it. Appears that it's > not much of an issue. Not any significantly sized AS at least.. IMO, filtering inconsistent AS would be more "too much time on hands" and hectic process than building and updating prefix-list to drop top 10 deaggregators listed in cidr-report.org :) In operational sense, there should not be any problems in reaching almost the entire internet in my experience. There are some issues with incon. AS_PATHs as others noted, but technically speaking, BGP in itself doesn't care about it in its route selection process. It cares about AS_PATH length (and AS loop) during its selection process, not what number ends in a path. This is a common confusion by many low/mid-level engineers and sales engineers who claim their network having lower AS number somehow makes them more trafficked and preferred AS :) But what Steve suggested is probably more important operationally for what you're trying to do. Transit/peer/customer relationships often catch first-timers doing anycast by surprise when routes don't go where they want to go in some cases. Regards, james