North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: The Cidr Report
It sounds like government work! When something doesn't work, they just make numbers up! (Just be sure to create more plausible numbers next time! (smirk)) Scott -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Huston Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:15 PM To: Fergie; [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: The Cidr Report When my zebra BGP daemin looses its grip on life and dies a horrible death the rest to the scripts wander into a strange twilight zone and make up numbers sorry (I really need to code more defensively for this type of condition!) geoff At 04:56 AM 11/11/2006, Fergie wrote: >Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-) > >Date Prefixes CIDR Aggregated >04-11-06 199323 129829 >05-11-06 199330 129854 >06-11-06 199273 129854 >07-11-06 -1077937252 129854 >08-11-06 -1077936760 129854 >09-11-06 672037797 129854 >10-11-06 -1077937324 129854 >11-11-06 134555024 129854 > >- ferg > > > >-- Simon Leinen <[email protected]> wrote: > >cidr-report writes: > > Recent Table History > > Date Prefixes CIDR Agg > > 03-11-06 199409 129843 >[...] > > 10-11-06 134555024 129854 > >Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week! >(But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the >IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR >Report software has an R200K problem? >-- >Simon. > > > >-- >"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson > Engineering Architecture for the Internet > fergdawg(at)netzero.net > ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|