|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: advise on network security report
>I beg to differ, wither I aggregate my announcements does not impact the >$50B charge identity theft puts on the US economy. Perhaps a better start on impacting this would be for the credit card companies to pursue the people that abuse their cards/systems instead of just writing fraudulent purchases off as a loss and not pursuing them any further. I been through it myself and I know for a fact that at least one major cc company operates in this way. In this model there's nothing to discourage someone from using stolen numbers. Just my $.02 ~M -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Rick Wesson Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:02 PM To: Barry Greene (bgreene) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: advise on network security report Barry Greene (bgreene) wrote: > Postings like this to NANOG will not have any impact. So if your goal is > instigate action, posting is not going to work. The core data point is > the weekly CIDR report. It only works if you have peers using the weekly > list to apply peer pressure to the networks listed to act. I beg to differ, wither I aggregate my announcements does not impact the $50B charge identity theft puts on the US economy. would it assist if I associated a dollar value for each bot hosted, we can estimate the number of credit cards stolen per bot and extrapolate in to something with some zeros on it. > Sharing summaries to communities like dshield, NSP-SEC, DA, SANs and > other security mitigation communities along with a subscription web page > that would allow an organization to get enough details to take action. nsp-sec players still won't let us in their sand-box... but we will share to the communities you have enumerated. -rick
|