|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?)
The only data I have is from the MIT anti-spoofing test project which has been pretty consistent for a long time. About 75%-80% of the nets, addressses, ASNs tests couldn't spoof, and about 20%-25% could. The geo-location maps don't show much difference between parts of the world. RIPE countries don't seem to be better or worse than ARIN countries or APNIC countries or so on. ISPs on every continent seem to be about the same. http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/summary.php If someone finds the silver bullet that will change the remaining 25% or so of networks, I think ISPs on every continent would be interested. On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Fergie wrote: No. I think that is indicative of the problem. Don't you? -- Sean Donelan <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Fergie wrote:I don't want to detract from the heat of this discussion, as important as it is, but it (the discussion) illustrates a point that RIPE has recognized -- and is actively perusing -- yet, ISPs on this continent seem consistently to ignore: The consistent implementation of BCP 38. It is nothing less than irresponsible, IMO... Why _is_ that?Do you have any data concerning the actual consistent deployment of BCP38++ in different parts of the world?
|