North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: 10,352 active botnets (was Re: register.com down sev0?)
Jose's numbers are conservative. Given some mathematical acrobatics, I'd suggest examining some of the (shocking) number sin Microsoft's Security Intelligence Report (Google it) -- these are reflective: "Of the 4 million computers cleaned by the company's MSRT (malicious software removal tool), about 50 percent (2 million) contained at least one backdoor Trojan. While this is a high percentage, Microsoft notes that this is a decrease from the second half of 2005. During that period, the MSRT data showed that 68 percent of machines cleaned by the tool contained a backdoor Trojan." Ref: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2036439,00.asp If you're wondering why DDoS attacks are so effective, look no further than your backyard. - ferg -- Sean Donelan <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [email protected] wrote: > Well, let's talk about "worst-case ddos". Let's say, 50mpps (I have not > heard of ddos larger that that number). Let's say, you can sink/filter > 100kpps on each box (not unreasonable on higher-end box with nsd). That > means, you should be able to filter this attack with ~500 servers, > appropriately place. Say, because you don't know where the attack will > come in, you need 4 times more the estimated number of servers, that's > 2000 servers. That's not entirely unreasonable number for a large enough > company. Botnets were the topic at today's Info Security conference in New York City. <http://www.infosecurityevent.com> Coincidences? Or just as random as your iPod shuffle? Jose Nazario estimated that there were 10,352 botnets active on the Internet earlier this year. You will probably always be outnumbered on the public Internet. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|