North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Broadband ISPs taxed for "generating light energy"

  • From: Alexander Harrowell
  • Date: Tue Oct 10 12:05:25 2006
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sVr8CzTOAArZ2VNysbHLQnuEg7DdBftLtTQbEPEyGkEQEZvlYNSHrnXJDmgP6Mngvka+aQFZeyiWznPldMgHVAiGWs5qjjI10TPgQuMBlIuJ581I4mMGgcvtTmsnNkzFmLBiyhPVmcrwZYSmUhFhDZqFSx0r14XWDW544qWU2SI=
Reasonable? I think you mean "justifiable".

On 10/10/06, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Sounds reasonable to me. Since the sale of energy is
    > usually measured in kilowatt-hours, how many kwh of
    > energy is transmitted across the average optical fibre
    > before it reaches the powereda mplifier in the destination
    > switch/router?

Also, remember, it's _net_ energy delivered which matters...  I'm sure the
customer is delivering light back toward the ISP as well.

                                -Bill