North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Kremen's Buddy?
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:55:11PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:Ever notice the only folks happy with the status quo are the few who haveI find the references to alleged, inherent difficulties with the ARIN resource assignment process increasingly tedious. Even if the templates were "impossible to decipher", this isn't the forum to discuss them. In my opinion, you do the argument in favour of open trading of addresses as commodities a rank disservice by linking it to this kind of FUD.
I'm not sure I completely buy this. However, I guess these days I'm one of the "few" who already have an intimate knowledge. I do remember being frustrated with the process when I was new to the process and even more so when the process was new. However, I can say that today, the process is much better documented, simpler, and more efficient than it was 10 or even 5 years ago.
Try looking at it from an outsider's point of view instead. If you're newI've had several clients who indeed perceived it this way. However, in
each of their cases, I was able to spend a few hours working with them
to collect the necessary information, fill out the ARIN template on their
behalf, and, obtain address space for them in between 5 and 20
man hours. In terms of elapsed calendar time from initial submission
to allocation, it ranged from 4-10 days if you don't count delays induced
by my clients not having certain prerequisites in place on time.
In any kind of free market system, competition would have bitchslapped theI'm not sure this is true. I think if you compare the ARIN process for getting
IP addresses to the FCC process for getting spectrum, ARIN's process is
MUCH easier. Care to venture what it takes to get an allocation for a
geosynchronous orbital slot? Guaranteed that's quite a bit harder than
ARIN's process. Ever try to get your own issuance of phone numbers
from NANPA or another telephone number registry? Yeah, that's quite
a bit harder than ARIN, too.
Can you please point to another registry for globally unique limited
numeric addresses which is easier to deal with than ARIN?
Somehow I suspect the only folks who wouldn't welcome this are the ones
while I have not always seen eye-to-eye with ARIN, this comment is flat out unjustified in my opinion. ARIN works very hard to provide an open and transparent governance process. They put significant effort into outreach trying to make the process easier and more accessible to newcomers. They have made significant effort to help people gain access to the addresses they need while still trying to be an effective gatekeeper against unwarranted hoarding or unjustified address acquisition. I'm not on the "ARIN travel plan", but, I do find the public policy meetings a useful forum. I think that combined with the PPML, they provide about the best possible process for the evolution of IP policy in the ARIN service region. If you have a better idea, let's hear it. How would you like to see things done? The primary difference between whining and constructive criticism is that constructive criticism includes suggested remedies to the situation. Owen