North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: GTSM - Do you use it?

  • From: Merike Kaeo
  • Date: Thu Aug 17 20:14:17 2006


I don't think that's a fair assumption. A few providers I talked to for a security current practiced document I am writing said they were deploying it between BGP peers and I recently asked for more clarification from some individuals to ensure I had correct info with respect to vendors. There is some support in some J boxes and also support in C boxes. I didn't get specific detail how it was deployed, just that is was.


- merike


On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:48 PM, John Smith wrote:



Then is it fair to assume that operators are not using it?


----- Original Message ----
From: Pekka Savola <[email protected]>
To: John Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, 18 August, 2006 2:15:31 AM
Subject: Re: GTSM - Do you use it?


On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, John Smith wrote:
I would like to know if operators use GTSM techniques with BGP and
other routing protocols today? Is any at the perimeter of the
routing domain deployed? I would believe that GTSM can provide
protection against attacks more than a hop away and thus can save
against a lot of potential Dos attacks.

Is anything done by the operators here?

We'd love to use it but unfortunately the J vendor doesn't support it very well even on T-series (if it supports it at all, not quite sure..).

Enhancement Requests haven't gotten through, but maybe gripes on nanog
will :-(

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings