North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: ISP wants to stop outgoing web based spam
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Thu Aug 10 02:08:58 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q4NsSmHAkllC+0VMSgslO6Tsg7F1aK9eVc+ZGhuR7YHMVGgXeJVN43y5k3+FaXZaHj03xxgS9iZyBvKNHUGRNot13B87+fHq+GhUpUNfFB//mJ2eM5MtrXxhZrXhpW0InvxPwxcjqpPnTkBpNSu8RIjMgfUi60w970sP2yOUwxQ=
On 8/10/06, Sean Donelan <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> The MAAWG bcps, for example, state that ISPs must take responsiblity
> for mitigating outbound spam and abuse.
The RIAA, for example, states that ISPs must take responsibility for
mitigating copyright infringement by its users.
Oh - but maawg (http://www.maawg.org) is a group of ISPs themselves
(AOL, comcast, charter, france telecom, Hotmail, us ..)
Lots of groups state that ISPs must take responsibility for lots of
things.
Lots of ISPs together stated that ISPs must take responsibility for a
few things.
Small, but significant difference there, dont you think?
srs
|