|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: SORBS Contact
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 06:49, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > We were hit by the requirement to include the word "static" in our DNS > names to satisfy requirements. It wasn't enough to just say "this /17 is > only static IPs, one customer, one IP, no dhcp or other dynamics at all), > we actually had to change all PTR records to this arbitrary "standard". > > Took several weeks to get delisted even after that. We've had our moments with SORBS, Matthew is a very approachable person. Things get sorted out pretty quickly, generally within a few days, Matthew also has others who help him and one of them is an obnoxious ####. I do agree though, the requirment to have X TTL and 'static' or non 'dsl' 'dial' in DNS is a bit too far, I understand this is for automation, its the only part of SORBS i disagree with, that said we still use them, as do many large carriers ion this country, because the use of RBL's is for one reason, to STOP the wanker, and SORBS along with spamcop and spamhaus and njabl go a very long way to prevent peoples privacy being invaded by those vernom
|