North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: NANOG Spam?

  • From: Henry Linneweh
  • Date: Thu Jul 06 12:12:40 2006
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dGJZPPL0Qm2A4X+liaEEzXXj9RnWu08OnyEv4DwHdGQ9935Z1LEPiJRtL7GpMviypaJly4P7mwEIjXgSK1PjMeSzHA0atbMkyzLHNPL1diDBAK/JYdwRCFjEcTpZyDpH+bVAauExLWokhaQadMWqeurrIcfhIef7II5ol/ocyVc= ;

I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email account specifically for Nanog,
anticipating spam....

sage ----
From: Dominic J. Eidson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG Spam?

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Sabri Berisha wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Hi,
> > Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
> > up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
> > plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
> So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
> they don't get moderated :)

The question would be - if you're hit by the moderation bit, and post a
message that makes it past whatever moderator's criteria.. Do you then
lose the moderation bit, since you how have posted within the last 9
months, and thusly have (unmoderated) access?

Or maybe this is just an exercise in let's-fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants...

- d.

Dominic J. Eidson
                                        "Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli