|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: a fun hijack: 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 7/8, 8/8, 12/8 brieflyannounced by AS 23520 (today)
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Josh Karlin wrote: > > I don't expect better from NW Network Cable, but I definitely expect > better from Sprint (their upstream). But this hasn't been the first and > most unfortunately, not the last, cuz, almost no one gives a f*ck > anymore. Well, when all we do about a situation is b*tch about it, waste time running after other people's tails, and repeat the same process all over again - we can't really expect for anything to change. If we won't take hold of these issues, eventually someone will take hold of them for us. They will most likely do a bad job at it but they will *do*, making our lives extremely difficult in the process. Which Government is your first bet? Unless this ISP is cut from the net by its uplink, and then called to answer before a judge or say, the FCC, nothing will change. The day this will happen will be a very sad say, as the uplink will not be making money and the Government will likely miss the whole point, but still. How can we complain about China when most of the problems are our own? Gadi. > > -Hank > > > > > Check out the IAR for "Potential Prefix Hijacks" and if you're coming > > to this more than 24 hours after the post, do a search on AS 23520 as > > the hijacking AS. > > > > I don't know how long the routes were announced, but they seem to be > > gone now. Or maybe the IAR is horribly broken, in which case I will > > be lynched :) > > > > IAR: http://cs.unm.edu/~karlinjf/IAR/ > > > > Josh > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > > at the Tel-Aviv University CC. > > >
|