North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Fwd: 41/8 announcement
On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:39:31 -0000, Peter Corlett said: > I can sort of see the point in ULAs, although if you want a globally unique > address, why not just use a public address? Maybe you don't *want* a public address. In fact, I *know* sometimes you don't want one - because you *tell* us you don't: > I tend to pick out random /24s from 172.16/12 when I need private addresses. > Virtually nobody uses those, which makes them most suitable. Sounds to me like you've just re-invented the ULA for IPv4. This same usage case (plus the collision issue you mentioned) are *exactly* why ULA's were pushed...