|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Fwd: 41/8 announcement
well they're not really hijacking it - as in they are not announcing it or affecting unrelated networks on the internet its no different than a private firewall/security policy, except we know they're doing it because they're broken not because they intend to be denying connectivity to those networks. Steve On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:31:24AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > so how many ISPs will shun fastweb for hijacking address space? > (please do -NOT- respond, its a retorical question...) > > --bill > > > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:37:12AM +0300, Richard Mikisa wrote: > > > > This came in from someone in Italy.. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: ***** > > Date: May 24, 2006 11:15 AM > > Subject: Re: 41/8 announcement > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > >>Turns out the folks at fastweb (Italy) NAT there adsl clients but > > >>instead of using the rfc1918 space like most people, they use > > >>unassigned > > >>global /8s. Well 41/8 is one of there NATted allocations for Turin. No > > >>amount of emails will get them to respond, calling isn't any better > > >>as I > > >>get only Italian speaking people at the other end. Any ideas out > > >>there? > > > > Yes: you lose, sorry. :-) > > Many of their networking people are less than clueful, and I fear that > > they are not going to renumber a whole city just to let their customers > > communicate with a few African networks... > > Let me know if you need more information. > > (Feel free to repost this if needed, but please remove my name.) > > > > -- > > ciao, > > ******* > > > > -- > > cheers > > Richard -- Stephen J. Wilcox BSc (Hons). CCIE #10730 Technical Director, Telecomplete http://www.telecomplete.co.uk/
|