North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Fwd: 41/8 announcement

  • From: Richard Mikisa
  • Date: Wed May 24 09:13:22 2006
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MCv/T5uS01jt+kEW1ARUE/WWZlY1lk6Uz/OTaonusHTPTJy2gUzoMoOPI1c+i+xKq1IOxm5r6sYE9IfSl8Vu20AEi0GrU0LOa75+3Rh0gs1PZzIsRlmj9Y0LEC7ijKIuT2znfz0rU9KIfXj70jBbKOj2t2tIahFySt9k+ip+odk=
Well, the noise helped some. We now have connectivity to fastweb net.

On 5/24/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

 so how many ISPs will shun fastweb for hijacking address space?
 (please do -NOT- respond, its a retorical question...)

--bill


On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:37:12AM +0300, Richard Mikisa wrote:
>
> This came in from someone in Italy..
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  *****
> Date: May 24, 2006 11:15 AM
> Subject: Re: 41/8 announcement
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> >>Turns out the folks at fastweb (Italy) NAT there adsl clients but
> >>instead of using the rfc1918 space like most people, they use
> >>unassigned
> >>global /8s. Well 41/8 is one of there NATted allocations for Turin. No
> >>amount of emails will get them to respond, calling isn't any better
> >>as I
> >>get only Italian speaking people at the other end. Any ideas out
> >>there?
>
> Yes: you lose, sorry. :-)
> Many of their networking people are less than clueful, and I fear that
> they are not going to renumber a whole city just to let their customers
> communicate with a few African networks...
> Let me know if you need more information.
> (Feel free to repost this if needed, but please remove my name.)
>
> --
> ciao,
> *******
>
> --
> cheers
> Richard


--
cheers
Richard